aprilhenry ([info]aprilhenry) wrote,
@ 2008-05-08 07:30:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Show Don’t Tell – My Personal Achilles Heel
I have published six books, with two more out due next spring, and am contracted for three more past that.

So you would think I knew how to avoid “telling, not showing.”

You would be wrong.

Take this sentence in a manuscript I’m revising: “My reading buddy, Melissa, started jumping up and down and screaming about how she hated the fifth-grade boys.”

Is that telling or showing?

I decided it was telling, because it was summarizing. It wasn’t specific. It felt past-tensey, like I was describing an event that had already happened, rather than one that was happening now. (Even though the book is written in past tense, it should still feel immediate.)

So I changed it to: “A scream cut through the noise. It was Melissa. Her face was red, and her hands were clenched into fists. She started jumping up and down. And with each breath, she screamed just one word. “I. Hate. Boys. It’s. All. Your. Fault.”

Showing lets readers draw their own conclusions. You could say “The man was ugly,” or you could describe him in detail without every using the word ugly (or angry, or beautiful, or intelligent) and let readers draw their own conclusion.

Of course, you can’t dramatize everything. Sometimes it’s fine to summarize to move the story along or if the point isn’t important.

One trick I’ve read about is to study movies – which of course can’t tell you anything (except perhaps in voice over). They have to show it.

Do you have a favorite trick to help you show, not tell?



site stats

Add This Blog to the JacketFlap Blog Reader


(Post a new comment)


[info]marla67
2008-05-08 03:58 pm UTC (link)
Sometimes you post exactly what I need to read. The rewrite of just that one line shows such an immediate difference in how the action feels.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]aprilhenry
2008-05-08 07:51 pm UTC (link)
I know it's probably not a perfect line - but I also know it IS better.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]siobhan_says_so
2008-05-08 06:55 pm UTC (link)
such a great post...

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]aprilhenry
2008-05-08 07:29 pm UTC (link)
No, no, you're supposed to tell me your tricks. Or at least your failings.

I showed you mine...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]crcook
2008-05-10 03:01 pm UTC (link)
I just posted last night about this very topic! I think I'm showing, but at least one crit partner will comment, "There's too much telling here" while another will say, "Nice showing!"

I have no tips to share, because apparently I still don't get it, but lizzy_lyn and kellyrfineman brought up good points:
One: perhaps it isn't telling but too much showing that interferes with the reader's emotional link to the scene.
Two: perhaps it's just telling dressed up with description, like your first example above.

Either way, it's something I need to work on every time I sit down to write

Edited at 2008-05-10 03:02 pm UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]aprilhenry
2008-05-10 10:04 pm UTC (link)
I still struggle with this, and even like your critique group, something that would pass muster with one editor might be decreed "telling" by another.

I liked all the responses to your post.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]crcook
2008-05-10 11:49 pm UTC (link)
I agree. It is subjective. It's easy to detect the obvious telling, but then you have the elusive sections that seem more personal preference. Does that make sense? One person might like how a writer shows through diaglog and action while another wants a more internalized interaction within the character's environment/conflict.

I think often it's so subtle and you just need to go wth your gut. But it would be nice if there was a black/white, right/wrong answer for everything. People try to make it so, but like most of life I don't think it's as clear cut as some would have you believe.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…