Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Blogs as a marketing tool (?)

  • Aug. 11th, 2008 at 6:34 AM

One of my publishers recently sent me a pamphlet about how to use the Internet to market your book. It had lots of good info, especially if it's your first book. And even more especially, if you write non-fiction. Their example used Author A, who had no web presence at all, and Author B, who wrote a book about the environment.

We don’t need to talk anymore about Author A, because his book is for all intents and purposes remaindered in short order.

Author B, who is a very busy bee, registers both his name and the name of his book, makes sure he has an entry in Wikipedia, etc. The part that caught my eye was that he starts a blog six months before the book comes out and posts 2-3 times a wee” about environmental issues “always being sure to put the stories and commentary in the context of his upcoming book.” And then links and posts to similar Web sites and blogs.

In the happy world of the brochure, by the time his book comes out, he has a readership of thousands, is asked to guest blog dozens of times, and even gets speaking gigs conferences and seminars. The book gets written up on dozens more blogs and mentioned in numerous email newsletters for environmental groups, which helpfully link back to his site.

Well, um, maybe. For non-fiction. Although it seems hard to think of how you could think of 75 topics you hadn’t covered in your actual book-book.

But for those of us who write fiction? I’m not sure this idea would work. I post a lot. I have a readership in the thousands. My next book even has a theme about environmental activists. Extreme environmental activists. But I couldn’t think of something to blog about on this topic 2-3 times a week for six months. Especially not of the “read more in my book” variety. I’m not sure what other blogs I would be commenting on. I’m not unsympathetic to ELF’s cause, but I’m also not pro.

I just don’t think fiction lends itself to 75 posts that all reference the book in some way. Plus putting even more posts on other blogs. Even if it could be done, that’s just too “me, me, me” for my taste.

I blog about writing, the writing business, books and authors I like, and stuff that catches my eye.Probably the latter is the only topic that might interest my potential readers. Maybe not even that. But I don’t know if I have the energy to think of stuff that would solely appeal to my readers. I’m not even sure what that would be.

What are your thoughts?



site stats

Add This Blog to the JacketFlap Blog Reader

Comments

[info]missrodeo wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 01:41 pm (UTC)
I think I would be really turned off by a blogger who mentioned their upcoming release in every single entry!!
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 01:50 pm (UTC)
That's what I was thinking.
[info]teriegarrison wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 02:32 pm (UTC)
I think the authors of the brochure don't have a clue about the concept of 'cause and effect'. Maybe the guy is a well-known public speaker who already had a platform that drew people to his blog. 'Someone has a blog, and their book does well, therefore, the blog made the book do well.' Let's see some actual evidence before we buy that.

I do think having a web presence is important for a writer, but I have serious doubts that any academic research would substiantiate that a blog is the actual driver of the success of a book.

Scott Lynch's books are doing really well, and he hasn't updated his blog since something like Nov 2007. Robin Hobb only just started a very infrequent blog. Most folks would envy their sales numbers.
[info]bostonerin wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 02:40 pm (UTC)
We have the same publisher, and I thought the same thing when I received that. First, there was panic, like "oh my god, I have to redo my blog," etc.

When I calmed down I realized how silly it was. Besides, kids aren't going to come to my blog to read about childhood obesity, good food choices, or chubby models. They're going to come to find out about me more than the themes of the book--that's how you build an audience. I hope.
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 03:11 pm (UTC)
Yes, I saw your book in the catalog! I was amazed how many fellow (well, I think sister, actually) LJers I saw in that catalog.

I don't know how much kids are going to come to our blogs at all.

Did you also notice that they specially singled out LJ as _not_ the way to go?
[info]bostonerin wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 04:00 pm (UTC)
Yep. But I have myspace (which I hate) and facebook, too, so I figure readers will find me if they're really looking. It is mostly other writers who are on lj, which is fine by me.

Saw your book in the catalog, too! So fun.
[info]lizjonesbooks wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 02:57 pm (UTC)
I agree with you. I think there's something called reader fatigue, in addition to blogger fatigue-- if you're scraping your barrel to come up with topics rather than writing when something energizes you, your readers probably aren't going to connect with your entries in the way that they would with things you actually wanted to write. And you have an advantage here in any case, which is that you've been blogging for a long time. Someone who wants to know more(about your work which is um I think the point of it all) can just read your archives!
:D
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 11:39 pm (UTC)
That's exactly right. I blog because I want to, not because I feel I have to. I blog about stuff I care about. And if people want to know more about my recent books, they can page back.
[info]grrlpup wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 03:00 pm (UTC)
I hope this doesn't sound stalkerish, but I read authors' blogs more to feel acquainted with them as people than to read about their books-- even if I really like their books. If a blog is all about The Book and The Book Tour and Book News, I don't keep following it. I like hearing about everyday life and writing life.

If the brochure guy were a working climate scientist and writing about his research and life in the lab, I would be into it. If he's mostly a writer, then I don't need to hear how every news story he can think of relates to his book. Those connections won't be very valuable unless I feel like I've discovered them myself.
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 11:37 pm (UTC)
That's the same reason I read other authors' blogs. If it just seems like a big ad, I'm not interested.
[info]dlgarfinkle wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 03:55 pm (UTC)
I wonder how much publisher support was given to Author A vs. Author B. I think that's key.

My local Borders let me put my Supernatural Rubber Chicken books on the high-profile table at the front of the children's section, and all eight copies sold out within a month. At my local Barnes and Noble, the books are shelved spine out, and two copies sold.

I would be turned off by a blog that was all about the author's books.

Did they say why LJ was a bad idea?
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 04:54 pm (UTC)
They say, "Live Journal still exists, but its popularity has been eclipsed by newer companies that offer more features and better designs."
[info]gneri wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 04:48 pm (UTC)
Yeah, I got the same thing. My next book is about drug trafficking. I'm not sure I would attract the right audience if I blogged that much about traffickers. The DEA might take an interest though...
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 04:56 pm (UTC)
It would be so much easier if you had written a non-fiction book about drug trafficing. You could probably link to a news item a day about it. But readers might get tired of you mentioning your book in every post.
[info]maoun.wordpress.com wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2008 11:35 am (UTC)
Same-subject blogging
I'm reading this thread after having started my own blog on a topic related to my self-published novel (speculative fiction), so it's interesting to get some 20/20 hindsight. However, my experience has been that it's easy to find news stories that feed into the novel, at least tangentially, while avoiding frequent mention of the book. I simply have a link to it on my site, but not in every post. I think I've mentioned it only a couple times. I think this approach strikes a nice balance between annoying redundancy and ineffective subtlety.
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Oct. 4th, 2008 05:12 pm (UTC)
Re: Same-subject blogging
It looks like you do a good job with your blog, and that people who are interested in your posts would also be interested in your book. But I couldn't find your book on Amazon, and I think a lot of people will expect to be able to buy it there, self-pubbed or not.
[info]kidlit_kim wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 09:31 pm (UTC)
I agree with all of the above comments. It sounds more geared toward the authors of business books or authors who are motivational speakers. With PB/YA/MG there is that dual audience thing. The reader of the blog may or may not be the end reader (assuming the KID is reading the book and not one of the grown up kidlit lovers/teachers/writers/librarians, etc.)
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 10:02 pm (UTC)
Exactly. Even thought I occasionally blog on myspace, I have a feeling it's more adults reading my blogs than teens.

I could be wrong of course.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Aug. 12th, 2008 03:45 pm (UTC)
I think blogs that stay "on topic" are as boring as the dinner conversationalist who can only talk about one thing. I'm much more likely to read a blog that is wideranging in topics, and slightly off-beat in topics. I love the blogs that post links to weird things they love. The most recent was cakewrecks.blogspot.com

I think most large publishers give very bad advice about building an electronic portfolio.

(Is it utterly hilarious that the spell check on Livejournal doesn't recognize the word blog or blogs?)
[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Aug. 12th, 2008 09:41 pm (UTC)
Yes, I think the blog spellcheck issue is funny - but cakewrecks.blogspot.com is even funnier. I have tears in my eyes right now.
[info]ajbarnett-story.blogspot.com wrote:
Nov. 8th, 2008 06:57 pm (UTC)
Blogging
I understand exactly where you're coming from.

I've been blogging for several months now - AFTER the event I'm afraid, so I have some catching up to do.

I agree with you. There's no way I could keep posting about my book. Fiction simply doesn't lend itself to it. I tend to post about things to do with writing instead. I just have my book on the sidebar so that any visitors have a view of it - more subliminal than direct mention of it, if you like.

It doesn't seem to help my sales though. I just daren't stop doing it, just in case.

[info]aprilhenry wrote:
Nov. 8th, 2008 07:45 pm (UTC)
Re: Blogging
I blog because I like to. Even if it didn't lead one more person to buy by books, I would still blog.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow