aprilhenry (aprilhenry) wrote,
aprilhenry
aprilhenry

Does a novelist need a bibliography?

When I wrote Circles of Confusion, I did tons of research about Vermeer, the forger Van Meegeren, art stolen during World War II, etc.

I kept a big file of photocopies, thinking someone might challenge me along the way – an editor , copyeditor , or reader - to show that the historical facts I had used were true.

No one ever did.

But now novelists are more often using bibliographies, probably for the same reason I kept my file – to show that they did their research.

In an article in the NY Times published a few months ago, some critics and authors found it off-putting or even vain.

“It’s a trend that is running out of control,” said Sebastian Faulks, the author of “Birdsong” and “Charlotte Gray,” in a telephone interview from London. “Lots of writers use them as a way of showing off, saying, ‘Look how hard I’ve worked, look how clever I am, look at all these books I’ve read.’ It’s a plea to be taken seriously.”

I don’t think it’s a bad idea. Sometimes when I read a novel I want to know more about the facts its purporting to make fiction out of. What do you think?



site stats

Subscribe with
JacketFlap's
Children's
Publishing
Blog Reader
Tags: fact checking
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment