But now the movie producers want their option money back.
As the New York Times article says, “We bought the identity of the book’s author,” Mr. Curtner told the jury. He meant JT Leroy’s identity, which, with its alluring elements of poverty and prostitution, was perhaps more valuable than the book itself.
“And we bought it, in part,” Mr. Curtner said, “because she” — Ms. Albert — “was pimping it, pumping it, she was hustling it any way she knew how because she wanted to get the money.”
Ms. Albert, both in testimony and through her lawyer, Eric Weinstein, has said that JT Leroy was never a profit-making venture, despite the fact she paid a friend to appear in public as “JT” in a blond wig and sunglasses to promote the book. Her contention is that JT Leroy was not an ordinary nom de plume in the Mark Twain-Samuel Clemens mold but a fictional necessity, a sort of imaginary survival apparatus that allowed her both to write and to breathe.
On the stand, Albert has talked about being repeatedly molested. Her defense is that she needed JT to exist so that she could.
The whole thing is kind of like a train wreck. It’s hard to look away.
Read more here, with links.