aprilhenry (aprilhenry) wrote,
aprilhenry
aprilhenry

How books get picked to be reviewed

Some interesting facts from a Washington Post article about how books are chosen for review [Full disclosure: I've never been reviewed by the Washington Post, but I have by the Washington Times, which I think may be owned by the Moonies]:
- About 150 books are sent to it a DAY.
- The Post reviews or mentions about 2,000 a year. This includes mentions less than 200 words.
- Genre books - including self-help, as well as mysteries, sci-fi, and romance - are relegated to round-ups for "devotees."
- "Book World Editor Marie Arana and her staff look at every book for significance, literary worth, variety and just a good read. But they also look for a little bit of magic."
- "Mass-market writers who produce every year, such as Danielle Steel and James Patterson, usually aren't reviewed."
- ""Self-published books don't stand a chance."
- The editor starts by picking 35-60 books a week. She reads a bit of them, and eventually picks out 15 to 20.
- She pays no attention to blurbs.
- She does pay attention to early reviews in Kirkus and Publishers Weekly.
- " Reviewers must sign a statement saying they have no conflict in reviewing a book. Occasionally reviewers have signed that statement knowing that they had a conflict, and Arana has found out only after a review has been published. Arana apologized in print after she found out that author Marianne Wiggins, who signed the statement, slammed a book by John Irving without divulging that Irving was a close friend of Wiggins's ex-husband, Salman Rushdie."

Read more here. You may have to register but they don't seem to sell your name or bug you.

Here's what I've said about how I chose books for review.



site stats
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 0 comments